meanfreepath: (Default)
meanfreepath ([personal profile] meanfreepath) wrote2010-05-31 04:11 pm

(no subject)

Why does Israel have to be put on the defensive internationally after its commandos use limited force in response to being attacked with potentially deadly weapons? Would anyone be complaining if the men and women of the US Navy were to use lethal force to defend themselves in the course of interdicting Somali pirates?

[identity profile] rose_garden.livejournal.com 2010-06-02 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/06/gaza_flotilla

"[E]mploying a bit of violence in your protest, enough to provoke a murderous reaction, is more effective than eschewing violence altogether. Five of the six ships taken over by Israeli commandos put up no resistance. They didn't make the news. The sixth, the Mavi Marmara, had about 600 passengers on board, and of those, 570 or so appear to have stayed below deck as the commandos arrived. They didn't make the news either. The other 30 went up on deck."