ext_78309 ([identity profile] rose_garden.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] meanfreepath 2006-09-26 06:08 am (UTC)

It's fun to hear your thoughts about Jackson. Pseudovectors didn't surprise me at all--it just seemed like a natural result of defining vectors more rigorously and in a way more useful for physics.

But I still like the mathematical definition of a vector: anything that satisfies all those axioms. I'm assuming that pseudovectors do in fact fall under the umbrella of mathematical vectors, but I'm not checking the definitions at the moment.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting