meanfreepath (
meanfreepath) wrote2006-09-25 09:48 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
So I guess I've been inadvertently lying for the last two years or so every time I've told someone in the Physics Clinic that quantities like magnetic field B or torque are vectors. But what else do you tell people in introductory physics?
Until today I really did believe that B was a vector. But having finally managed to work out a long E/M problem on the transformation properties of vectors vs. pseudovectors (aka axial vectors), and having shown that curls transform like pseudovectors, I stand corrected. For while pseudovectors transform like vectors under some orthogonal transformations, such as rotations, they don't transform like vectors under reflections or switching from right to left-handed coordinates.
Until today I really did believe that B was a vector. But having finally managed to work out a long E/M problem on the transformation properties of vectors vs. pseudovectors (aka axial vectors), and having shown that curls transform like pseudovectors, I stand corrected. For while pseudovectors transform like vectors under some orthogonal transformations, such as rotations, they don't transform like vectors under reflections or switching from right to left-handed coordinates.
no subject
no subject
Or try:
Mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Pseudovector.html) (although Arfken is cited)
or
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudovector) (this article cites Arfken too, so perhaps your best bet is to look there).
no subject
But I still like the mathematical definition of a vector: anything that satisfies all those axioms. I'm assuming that pseudovectors do in fact fall under the umbrella of mathematical vectors, but I'm not checking the definitions at the moment.
no subject